Drawing for PIONEER PARTNERS PROGRAM

USPTO serial 76324638

PIONEER PARTNERS PROGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIONEER PARTNERS PROGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William F. Lawrence

WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fungicides, termiticides and pesticides for commercial and domestic useACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of environmental healthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance