USPTO serial 76324705
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
Sweet Blessings LLC233 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 900Santa Monica, CA 90401CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | C18P | CANCELLED SECTION 18-PARTIAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |