USPTO serial 76324726
ENERGY DRINK E BLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGY DRINK E BLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Slavick
SCOTT J SLAVICK BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRITIONALLY FORTIFIED ENERGY DRINK BEVERAGE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |