USPTO serial 76324883
PIPING HOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIPING HOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Melbourne Victoria, AU
West Melbourne Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Murray
ROBERT B MURRAY ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PCSTE 8001425 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacles, optical lenses; sunglasses and sunglasscases; scuba diving and swimming goggles and masks; publications, namely books and magazines featuring surf, dive and swim articles in electronic form, in downloadable form and recorded form on computer media; DVDs, computer software, CD-ROM, video and audio tapes and discs, all featuring sound or images involving surf, dive or swim subject matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, all-purpose sports bags, athletic bags, beach bags, carry-on bags, school bags, wrist-mounted carryall bags, clutch bags, cosmetic bags sold empty, duffle bags, garment bags for travel, overnight bags, roll bags, shoulder bags, souvenir bags, suit bags, tote bags, travel bags, leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, handbags; backpacks, purses, cases, namely, attache cases, business cases, credit card cases, key cases, document cases, vanity cases sold empty, suitcases; satchels, trunks, wallets, umbrellas and covers therefore; straps, namely, straps for handbags, straps for luggage | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shorts, t-shirts, shirts, jackets, dresses, pants, jeans, coats, singlets and skirts; footwear, namely, sandals, thongs, runners, namely, athletic shoes, boots, sheepskin boots; knit shirts, knit sweaters, socks, underwear, sheepskin coats; wetsuits; swimwear, headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors and beanies | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting articles and equipment, games and playthings, namely, sport balls, foam sport balls, miniature sport balls, beach balls, tennis balls, soccer balls, basketballs, footballs, volleyballs, baseballs, golf balls, and racquet balls; sport games, namely, marbles, jacks, yo-yos and board games; puzzles, tennis racquets, squash racquets; sport paddles, namely, paddles for use with paddle ball games, platform tennis paddles, and table tennis paddles; baseball bats; flying discs, spinning tops; inflatable water toys; water games, namely, water volleyball sets and waterpolo sets; surfboards, body boards, body-board carry bags, surf skis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Piping Hot Surfwear Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Piping Hot Surfwear Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PIPING HOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |