USPTO serial 76324999
SOLISTICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, R. KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLISTICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Desarrollo Logistico, S.A. de C.V.
64410 Monterrey, N.L., MX
Other trademarks owned by Desarrollo Logistico, S.A. de C.V.
Desarrollo Logistico, S.A. de C.V.
64410 Monterrey, N.L., MX
Other trademarks owned by Desarrollo Logistico, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Ann Wheelis
LEE ANN WHEELIS THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated teller machines; devices for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images, namely computer hardware, communications software for connecting computer network users, electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network, computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality, computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, and computer telephony software; magnetic data storage devices, namely magnetic tape drives, cassette recorders and digital audio tape recorders; computers; coin operated vending machines; data processors and equipment for data processors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |