USPTO serial 76325061
DR. HEARTY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DR. HEARTY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fourways 2055, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dianne M. Smith-Misemer
DIANNE M SMITH-MISEMER SPENCER FANE BRITT BROWNE LLP1000 WALNUT ST STE 1400KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2140UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | WEIGHT MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY DIET PILLS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS, AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR WEIGHT REDUCTION AND WEIGHT MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING MEDIAL AND HEALTH CARE INFORMATION AND CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF NUTRITION, DIET PLANNING, WEIGHT MANAGEMENT AND WEIGHT REDUCTION; BEAUTY SALON SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |