Drawing for THE CHALLENGE

USPTO serial 76325271

THE CHALLENGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHALLENGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. JAY SPIEGEL

H JAY SPIEGELP O BOX 444MOUNT VERNON, VA 22121-0444UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041conducting of a sporting event in the sport of golf in which contestants compete at a designated hole on a golf course for prizes,ACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 14, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance