USPTO serial 76325279
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean D. Garrison
SEAN D GARRISON LEWIS AND ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4429UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely magazines, pamphlets, newsletters and information sheets featuring information on a variety of charitable and community organizations and topics | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2002 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting conferences in the field of charitable giving and organizations | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2001 |
| 042 | Promoting public understanding and awareness of the need for and social benefits of faith-based and community charitable organizations; providing information about the laws and regulations concerning faith-based and community charitable organizations; providing information about the development, growth, support and effective use of faith-based and community charitable organizations | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |