USPTO serial 76325410
ESPERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESPERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance underwriting in the field of liability, fire, home, automobile, theft, business premises, personal injury, life and valuables; insurance administration in the field of liability, fire, home, automobile, theft, business premises, personal injury, life and valuables; insurance agency services; financial analysis and consultation; financial forecasting; financial guarantee and surety services; banking services; financial clearinghouse services; assuming financial risks of others by entering into options and swaps; financial exchange; financial information in the nature of rates of exchange; making secured and unsecured loans; maintaining bank accounts; monetary exchange; and real estate services, namely, real estate appraisal, real estate agency services; operating market places for sellers of real estate; leasing of real estate; land and building acquisition, namely, real estate brokerage services and financial valuation of personal and commercial property and real estate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |