Drawing for BABY VIVALDI

USPTO serial 76325426

BABY VIVALDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY VIVALDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven B. Smith

MS MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0633UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely t-shirts, casual shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters and pants, headgear, namely hats and caps, and footwear, all for young childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance