Drawing for TH

USPTO serial 76325653

TH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Gursky and Mary L. Grieco

STEVEN R GURSKY & MARY L GRIECO DREIER LLP499 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of on-going television and radio programs and live performances in the fields of fashion, lifestyles and musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 7, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance