USPTO serial 76325660
VITEX SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117470Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VITEX SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Gambrel
Kimberly Gambrel Dinsmore & Shohl LLPONE SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 1300Fifth Third CenterDAYTON, OH 45402-2058Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely, substrates comprised of thin polymer films, namely, polymer films, polymer sheets, and multi-layer film coatings comprised of organic material or of organic and inorganic material, all applied in a vacuum for use in the further manufacture of displays and other electronic devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | [ multi-layer thin film protective barrier coatings comprised of organic material or of organic and inorganic material on a substrate applied to electronic devices to modify the physical properties of a surface and to create a highly impermeable thin film for use in inhibiting ingress by water and oxygen and corrosion by water and oxygen ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ barrier vacuum deposition system comprised of a single vacuum chamber or sequential vacuum chambers designed to deposit multi-layer thin film coatings composed of polymer layers and ceramic layers, load lock or other transfer station to allow for transfer of the material to be coated to the multi-layer thin film barrier coating deposition equipment, equipment to apply a mechanical protection to the multi-layer thin film barrier coating, process control equipment to monitor and control the multi-layer thin film and associated processes, test equipment to measure the performance of the thin-film barrier coating and tools and equipment for the maintenance, calibration and cleaning of the aforesaid equipment, all of the foregoing sold as a unit ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2005 |
| 017 | [ polymer film coated with a polymer and indium tin oxide in sheet form for application to electronic devices; polymeric substrate material coated with a multi-layer thin polymer film coating comprised of an organic material or of organic and inorganic material deposited in sheet form on which a layer of transparent oxide coating or similar conductive material has also been deposited in sheet form for application to electronic devices ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ vacuum application of polymer coatings to electronic devices to protect against moisture or oxygen, namely, application for others of multi-layer thin films comprised of organic material or of organic and inorganic material to substrates in order to modify the physical properties of a surface and to create a highly impermeable thin film barrier for use in inhibiting ingress by water and oxygen and corrosion by water and oxygen ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitex Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitex Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vitex Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VITEX SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |