Drawing for MEGA URETER

USPTO serial 76325708

MEGA URETER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEGA URETER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wayne A. Sivertson

WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Urology Access SheathACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance