Drawing for COLORECTALERT

USPTO serial 76325751

COLORECTALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORECTALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce A. Tassan

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010DIAGNOSTIC AND MONITORING KITS FOR COLORECTAL CANCER COMPRISED OF GLASS FIBER FILTER STRIP, POLYSTYRENE SUPPORT, RECLOSABLE PLASTIC BAG, GALACTOS OXIDASE; SCHIFF'S REAGENT, PERIODIC ACID, HANDHELD SPECTROPHOTOMETER, AND PERSONAL COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 3, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance