CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LUNGALERT

USPTO serial 76325752

LUNGALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUNGALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Clifford

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010DIAGNOSTIC AND MONITORING KITS FOR LUNG DISORDERS COMPRISED OF SAMPLE COLLECTION CUP, GLASS FIBER FILTER STRIP, POLYSTYRENE SUPPORT, RECLOSABLE PLASTIC BAG, MUCOLYTIC CLELAND'S REAGENT, POSITIVE CONTROL, GALACTOSE OXIDASE; SCHIFF'S REAGENT, PERIODIC ACID, HANDHELD SPECTROPHOTOMETER, AND PERSONAL COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 3, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance