USPTO serial 76325755
POWERED BY INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERED BY INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. McKeown
JAMES F MCKEOWN CROWELL & MORING LLPP O BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or image, namely, data-capture sensor for extended floating car data, car crash and airbags sensor connected to the emergency call function, display screen, voice sensor, controller button, navigation system, camera, adaptive light control, short and long-range radar sensor, active steering wheel, active accelerator pedal, and brake force display; data processing equipment, namely, data capture sensors for extended floating car data, car crash and airbag sensors connected to the emergency call function, wireless connectivity system consisting of devices which are radio linked to each other in a small network and designed to send or receive data; navigation system comprised of GPS receiver, onboard or off board digital maps, positioning unit, car sensors, route planning algorithm and operating controls designed to use the functionalities of the system; electronic control apparatus consisting of integrated mobile phone and integrated navigation system, for the transmission of data that are relevant for conducting a motor vehicle; computer programs and software for gathering and sorting online browser accounts, e-mail accounts, personal directories, trade and directory assistance; computer software uses for gathering political, sports, science and regional news, business and financial news, sharing prices, namely, watch lists, weather information, parking information, emergency pharmacy centers, guides and other travel information, 3D images with aerial view of current location, network systems, and image processing and distance calculator | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobiles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging, conducting and promoting trade shows in the field of automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing presentations on technical innovations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named POWERED BY INTELLIGENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |