USPTO serial 76326052
ROLDAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLDAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
28035, Madrid, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber, Esq.
ROBERT C FABER ESQ OSTROLENK1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Hot and cold rolled steel products and steel rods, bars and billets and plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |