Drawing for EVERY CHILD, EVERY DAY

USPTO serial 76326055

EVERY CHILD, EVERY DAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERY CHILD, EVERY DAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Hansing

MARK D HANSING ZARLEY MCKEE THOMTE VOORHEESGRAND801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and interactive multimedia computer programming for use in teaching and promoting literacy; prerecorded audio and video disks and tapes featuring information about literacy; electronic recorded or downloadable publications, namely books and manuals featuring literacy"ACTIVE—
016Printed materials in the field of literacy development, namely books, forms, newsletters, manuals, printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials, all relating to literacy developmentACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, development, publication, and dissemination of educational materials in the field of literacy development; consulting and research in the field of literacy; providing courses of instruction, coaching and training to teachers and administrators in the field of literacy; conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of literacy; and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—
042technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer consultation and research in the field of literacy; counseling in the field of literacyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2003REINREINSTATED—
May 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance