USPTO serial 76326116
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally J. Utley
SALLY J UTLEY LADAS PARRY AND VON GEHE224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604-2581UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |