USPTO serial 76326192
R OPTORUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3596892Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with R OPTORUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saitamaken, 350-0801, JP
Saitamaken, 350-0801, JP
Saitamaken, 350-0801, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSONTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EVAPORATION AND SPUTTERING VACUUM DEPOSITION COATERS, CONSISTING OF VACUUM PUMPS, ELECTRON BEAM EVAPORATORS, RF ION SOURCE, OPTICAL FILM THICKNESS CONTROLLER, CRYSTAL DEPOSITION MONITOR, VACUUM CHAMBER, CONTROL PANEL, PROCESS-CONTROL SOFTWARE AND SUBSTRATE HEATING AND ROTATION DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 2001 |
| 009 | OPTICAL MEASURING APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MEASUREMENT OF DENSE WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (DWDM) FILTERS AND OPTICAL FILTER COMPONENTS THEREFOR; OPTICAL THICKNESS MONITORS, CONSISTING OF LIGHT SOURCE AND POWER SUPPLIES; OPTICAL DETECTOR AND AMPLIFIER; SPECTROPHOTOMETER; OPTICAL SPECTRUM ANALYZER; ION SOURCES, CONSISTING OF RADIO FREQUENCY COILS AND POWER SUPPLY, GRIDS, QUARTZ CHAMBER, HIGH VOLTAGE POWER SUPPLY, GAS CONTROLLER, AND CONTROL SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Optorun
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Optorun
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Optorun
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named R OPTORUN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |