Drawing for ONE-DISH CLASSICS

USPTO serial 76326210

ONE-DISH CLASSICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2765179Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 2003
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ONE-DISH CLASSICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Bikus

Christopher M. Bikus Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP1620 Dodge StreetSuite 2100Omaha, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dinners and entrees consisting primarily of beef, poultry, seafood, vegetables, chili or stewSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 15, 2003
030Dinners and entrees consisting primarily of pasta or riceSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 22, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 5, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 7, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 16, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 23, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance