USPTO serial 76326213
BALMORAL ULTRAFLOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BALMORAL ULTRAFLOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Loirston Aberdeen AB12 3GY, GB
Loirston Aberdeen AB12 3GY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan D. Parker
BRYAN D PARKER SHAWNCOULSON LLP1850 M ST NW STE 280WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Synthetic foam modules, including all parts and fittings, used in deep sea riser buoyancy systems to provide buoyancy and impact and abrasion protection for risers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |