USPTO serial 76326297
SPINELIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPINELIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
63360 Saint Beauzire, FR
63360 Saint Beauzire, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, BIOLOGICAL MOLECULE ANALYZERS, NAMELY, DNA SEQUENCERS; PROTEIN SEPARATION SYSTEMS, COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY; DNA ANALYZERS; ELECTROPHOTETIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, COMPRISING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY; SYSTEMS FOR MOLECULAR IMAGING BASED ON SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTION, COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH HUMAN CARE, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DIAGNOSTICS, NAMELY, POINT OF CARE TESTS DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY, MOBILE DEVICES FOR RAPID DIAGNOSTICS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY, HUMAN AND ANIMAL DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY DEVICES COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY; MICRO ARRAYS ANALYSIS SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DATA READER COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY, APPARATUS FOR HUMAN CARE DIAGNOSTIC BASED ON A SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTION COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, ANALYSIS, DISPLAY AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE, NAMELY, ANGIOGRAPHY DETECTION APPARATUS, RADIOLOGICAL APPARATUS, DIGITAL RADIOLOGY MACHINES, DIGITAL IMAGING READOUT SYSTEMS, NAMELY, ELECTRONICS HARDWARE FOR READOUT, DIGITALIZATION, TRANSMISSION AND SOFTWARE FOR DATA DISPLAY AND ANALYSIS, CHEST RADIOLOGICAL APPARATUS, MAMMOGRAPHIC RADIOLOGICAL APPARATUS, DENTAL RADIOLOGICAL APPARATUS, ANGIOGRAPHY RADIOLOGICAL APPARATUS, 2-D AND 3-D VESSELS AND HUMAN BODY PARTS IMAGING APPARATUS, INTERVENTIONAL AND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, HUMAN AND ANIMAL IMAGING APPARATUS BASED ON SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |