Drawing for CRITTER CATCHERS

USPTO serial 76326477

CRITTER CATCHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRITTER CATCHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold S. Weintraub

ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB PLUNKETT & COONEY, PC38505 WOODWARD AVE STE 2000BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Wildlife, rodent, animal trapping servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 6, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 14, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 14, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 13, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance