Drawing for SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG

USPTO serial 76326891

SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWELL BY CYNTHIA ROWLEY & ILENE ROSENZWEIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LANCE C VENABLE

LANCE C VENABLE ELLIS & VENABLE101 N 1ST AVE STE 1875PHOENIX, AZ 85003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, colognes, perfumes, toilet and skin soaps, body sprays, hand and body moisturizing lotions, facial moisturizer, facial and skin cleanser, exfoliating body and facial scrub, hand cream, body cream, foot cream, bubble bath, bath fizzes, bath tablets, bath gel, bath beads, bath salts, bath oil, shower gel, massage oil, dry oil spray, body oil, scented and unscented body mist, talcum powder, body scrub, foot scrub, shampoo, conditioner, room fragrance spray, potpourri, scented sachets, incense lip balm, hair conditioner, shower gel, and sunscreenACTIVE—
016Stationery; desktop business card holders, pocket diaries, business planners and checkbook coversACTIVE—
025Belts and glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 9, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 19, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 19, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance