USPTO serial 76327218
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer R. Quinn
JENNIFER R QUINN UNGARETTI & HARRIS3500 THREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing on-line portal services, namely, promoting and selling the goods and services of others on a web site accessed through a global computer network and via the electronic mailing of newsletters; offering portals for vertical marketing by third parties; facilitating on-line businesses of others; providing on-line recruiting services; and providing an on-line computer database in the nature of industry specific directory information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Online computer services, namely, providing a vertical portal website providing customers, suppliers and partners within the marketing community with business tools customizable by industry, access to products and services, access to information (namely, tutorials, periodicals, books and industry reports) and the ability to conduct business with one another | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |