Drawing for FULCRUM MICROSYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76327445

FULCRUM MICROSYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2942412Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 19, 2005
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FULCRUM MICROSYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTEGRATED CIRCUITSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN FOR OTHERSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 7, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 25, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 15, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 14, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Jun 29, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 29, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 20, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance