Drawing for NURSERY BY DESIGN

USPTO serial 76327455

NURSERY BY DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NURSERY BY DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Rubber balls, action figures and accessories, action skill games, bean bag dolls, plush toys, balloons, golf balls, tennis balls, bath toys, Christmas tree ornaments, board games, building blocks, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games, dolls and doll clothing, doll play sets, children's play cosmetics, crib toys, electric action toys, manipulative games, golf gloves, golf ball markers, jigsaw puzzles, kites, mobiles, music box toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, inflatable pool toys, multiple-activity toys, wind-up toys, target games, disc-type toss toys, bows and arrows, toy vehicles, toy cars, toy trucks, toy bucket and shovel sets, roller skates, toy model hobby-craft kits, toy rockets, toy guns, toy holsters, musical toys, badminton sets, bubble-making wands and solution sets, toy figurines, toy banks, puppets, yo-yos, skateboards, toy scooters, face masks, and hand-held units for playing electronic gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance