USPTO serial 76327625
RIVER RUN TO LAUGHLIN NEVADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 2006
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RIVER RUN TO LAUGHLIN NEVADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry Klein
HENRY KLEIN LADAS & PARRY LAW OFFICES5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Photographs; stationery; playing cards; decals; stickers; photographic albums; paper bags; bookmarks; calendars; paper coasters; comic books; books, magazines, newsletters and brochures all in the field of motorcycles, motorcycle events and motorcycle rallies; paper flags; folders; greeting cards; maps; modeling clay; note pads; pens; pencils; post cards; fine art prints and artistic posters; stencils; and printed tickets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 25, 2001 |
| 026 | Lace trimming; embroidered patches for clothing; patches, badges, pins and buttons for clothing; belt clasps, brooches as accessories, not of precious metal and not as imitation jewelry; clothing buckles; and prize ribbons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dal-Con Promotions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dal-Con Promotions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dal-Con Promotions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named RIVER RUN TO LAUGHLIN NEVADA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |