USPTO serial 76327653
EMG ESCO MUSIC GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMG ESCO MUSIC GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Cox
WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, VESTS, SWEATERS, SHOES, CAPS, BANDANNAS, SHORTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, PANTS, BELTS FOR CLOTHING, SOCKS, SWIM WEAR, JACKETS, RAIN WEAR, BLOUSES, DRESSES, FOOTWEAR, HOSIERY, SCARVES, HATS, HEAD BANDS, PAJAMAS AND SLEEP WEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |