USPTO serial 76327725
SMILECAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMILECAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buchon-City, Kyunggido, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
FREDERICK W MEYERS C/O LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Web video camera for use in connection with a personal computer, featuring; automatic motion tracking function by pan and tilt movement-- enabling video conferencing and remote monitoring over the Internet; useful in Internet telephony; and remote controllable over Internet connections | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |