Drawing for HEALTHY IDEAS NOURISHING BODY & MIND

USPTO serial 76327807

HEALTHY IDEAS NOURISHING BODY & MIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2850101Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 8, 2004
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY IDEAS NOURISHING BODY & MIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian P. Gregg

Brian P. Gregg MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK100 PINE STREETHARRISBURG, PA 17108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016[ Publications distributed solely in grocery stores, namely, pamphlets and brochures in the field of health, nutrition and wellness ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 30, 2000
035promoting public awareness of the need for health, nutrition and wellness, conducted by means other than the internetSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 30, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Apr 29, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 22, 2010815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 22, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2010PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Mar 11, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 8, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance