USPTO serial 76328037
3 IN 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3 IN 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton Amster
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER ROTHSTEIN90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1463UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL CAMCORDERS HAVING THE CAPABILITY OF FUNCTIONING AS A DIGITAL STILL CAMERA AND/OR AS A CAMERA PROVIDING CONNECTION TO THE INTERNET OR WEB | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |