USPTO serial 76328039
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton Amster
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER ROTHSTEIN90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1463UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DIGITAL CAMCORDERS HAVING THE CAPABILITY OF FUNCTIONING AS A DIGITAL STILL CAMERA AND/OR AS A CAMERA PROVIDING CONNECTION TO THE INTERNET OR WEB | ACTIVE | Jan 25, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |