Drawing for TANGERINE SORBET

USPTO serial 76328185

TANGERINE SORBET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TANGERINE SORBET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD G. LANCE IV

EDWARD G LANCE IV SC JOHNSON & SON INC1525 HOWE STRACINE, WI 53403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SHAVE GEL, SHAVE FOAM, SHAVE CREAM, SHAVING PREPARATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance