USPTO serial 76328295
BIOTIFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2850102Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOTIFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1204 Geneva, CH
PARIS, FR
GENEVA, CH
GENEVA, CH
GENEVA, CH
GENEVA, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicolas E. Seckel
NICOLAS E SECKEL WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hygienic products of biological origin, namely, hair care and coloring preparations, shampoos, deodorants, hair lotions, toothpastes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | all-purpose disinfectants; hygienic medicated products of biological origin, namely, medicated hair care and coloring preparations, medicated shampoos, medicated deodorants; dietary supplements, food supplements of biological origin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | milk, milk products, namely, aromatized milk, milk shakes, yoghurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, coffee substitutes based on grain or chicory | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | mineral water, sparkling water, non-alcoholic drinks, namely, lemonade, aromatized mineral and natural fruit or artificially flavored soda waters, fruit juices, fruit drinks, syrups for making fruit drinks and lemonades | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAKER SA
- Other trademarks owned by L'OREAL S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PAKERMAN SA
- Other trademarks owned by PAKERMAN SA
- Other trademarks owned by PAKERMAN SA
- Other trademarks owned by PEPUP SA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOTIFUL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |