USPTO serial 76328308
CHALLENGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CHALLENGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
EDGEWATER, FL, US
Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
Boston Whaler Commercial & Government Products, Inc.
LAKE FOREST, IL, US
Other trademarks owned by Boston Whaler Commercial & Government Products, Inc.
BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
EDGEWATER, FL, US
Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
EDGEWATER, FL, US
Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Lemke
Mark J. Lemke Mercury MarineW6250 Pioneer RoadP.O. Box 1939Fond du Lac, WI 54935Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | UTILITY AND INDUSTRIAL BOATS, NAMELY, BOATS MANUFACTURED FOR POLICE, MILITARY AND HEAVY-DUTY INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION, AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Boston Whaler Commercial & Government Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CHALLENGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |