Drawing for GRILL MASTERS BBQ THE FINEST RIBS, STEAKS AND SEAFOOD YOU'LL EVER TASTE SINCE 1952 CLASSIC 5 STAR QUALITY

USPTO serial 76328354

GRILL MASTERS BBQ THE FINEST RIBS, STEAKS AND SEAFOOD YOU'LL EVER TASTE SINCE 1952 CLASSIC 5 STAR QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRILL MASTERS BBQ THE FINEST RIBS, STEAKS AND SEAFOOD YOU'LL EVER TASTE SINCE 1952 CLASSIC 5 STAR QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul M. Denk

PAUL M DENK763 S NEW BALLAS RDST LOUIS, MO 63141-8704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035catalogue ordering services by mail, telephone, and the Internet in the field of foods, namely, steaks, ribs, and fishACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 1, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance