Drawing for MUSICATION HOUSE

USPTO serial 76328427

MUSICATION HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSICATION HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia S. Smart

Patricia S. Smart Smart & Bostjancich30 West Monroe Street, Suite 800Chicago, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films featuring musical performances; pre-recorded video cassettes, compact discs and DVDs, all featuring musical performancesACTIVE—
016Sheet music, series of fiction books and non-fiction books in the fields of music, entertainment and education; magazines containing fiction and non-fiction in the fields of music, entertainment and education; newsletters containing fiction and non-fiction in the fields of music, entertainment and education; booklets containing fiction and non-fiction in the fields of music, entertainment and educationACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television program featuring musical performances; entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television program featuring musical performances via the internet; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, and other multimedia materials featuring musical performances; live musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 12, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 10, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance