USPTO serial 76328458
ARCTIC CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3071341Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARCTIC CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
VERNON, CA
CAMBRIDGE, MA
Newport News, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel W. Sixbey
JEFFREY L. COSTELLIA, ESQ. NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SHRIMP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L.M. Sandler & Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by L.M. Sandler & Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SINGLETON FISHERIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN TO OCEAN SEAFOOD LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OCEAN TO OCEAN SEAFOOD LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ARCTIC CLASSIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |