USPTO serial 76328462
CELLMAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLMAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TEL AVIV, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK M. FRIEDMAN
MARK M FRIEDMAN BILL POLKINGHORN - DISCOVERY DISPATCHMARK FRIEDMAN LTD9003 FLORIN WAYUPPER MARLBORO, MD 20772Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS AND/OR CELLULAR OR OTHER PORTABLE HANDSETS; CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATION LOCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, IDENTIFYING AND TRANSMITTING DATA REGARDING THE LOCATION OR PROXIMITY TO A CELLULAR NETWORK OR TO EACH OTHER OF SUBSCRIBERS TO A CELLULAR NETWORK; PROVIDING A HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER DIAL-UP AND DEDICATED ACCESS TO THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |