USPTO serial 76328467
SUNNYSIDE ORGANICS LITTLE WASHINGTON VIRGINIA 22747
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNNYSIDE ORGANICS LITTLE WASHINGTON VIRGINIA 22747?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R Bush
DOUGLAS R BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEATS, FISH, POULTRY, AND GAME; PRESERVED, DRIED, AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES AND JAMS; MILK; CHEESE; DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS; EDIBLE FATS, FRUIT PRESERVES; PICKLES; VEGETABLE-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES; DAIRY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE; TEA; COCOA; SUGAR; RICE; TAPIOCA; SAGO; FLOUR; BREAKFAST CEREALS, PROCESSED CEREALS; BAKED AND CONFECTIONERY GOODS, NAMELY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS AND CAKES; ICE CREAM; HONEY; TREACLE; YEAST; BAKING POWDER; SALT; SPICE, PEPPER, MUSTARD, VINEGAR; SAUCES; SPICES; PROCESSED GRAINS; GRAIN-BASED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | AGRICULTURAL SEEDS; UNPROCESSED GRAINS FOR EATING, UNPROCESSED CEREALS; AGRICULTURAL GRAINS FOR PLANTING; PLANT SEEDS; FOODSTUFF FOR ANIMALS; MALT FOR BREWING AND DISTILLING | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | VEGETABLE JUICE, FRUIT JUICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunnyside Farms, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SUNNYSIDE ORGANICS LITTLE WASHINGTON VIRGINIA 22747
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |