Drawing for FRENCH KISS

USPTO serial 76328505

FRENCH KISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRENCH KISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Bontemps

TODD S BONTEMPS COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FL 3000 ELPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, bottled liqueurs, namely vanilla flavored schnappsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 14, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 27, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 30, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 25, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance