USPTO serial 76329371
JOIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
17600 Figueres (Girona), ES
17600 Figueres (Girona), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
KARIN SEGALL DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BLEACHING PREPARATIONS; GENERAL PURPOSE CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS; HAND AND BATH SOAPS; FRAGRANCES, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, COATS, PANTS; FOOTWEAR AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, EAR MUFFS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fundacion Gala-Salvador Dali
- Other trademarks owned by Fundacion Gala-Salvador Dali
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JOIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |