USPTO serial 76329645
MANHEIMER FLAVOR SYSTEMS AT WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANHEIMER FLAVOR SYSTEMS AT WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Coole
WILLIAM R COOLE LEGAL DEPTKERRY INCONE MILLINGTON RDBELOIT, WI 53511Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring for foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J. Manheimer, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by J. Manheimer, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KERRY GROUP SERVICES, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MANHEIMER FLAVOR SYSTEMS AT WORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |