USPTO serial 76329770
MEAL DEAL!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEAL DEAL!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirt S O'Neill
KIRT S O'NEILL AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELDP O BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | supermarket services | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |