USPTO serial 76329788
INVENERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVENERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald R. Lorenzen
E. Leonard Rubin REED SMITH LLP10 S. Wacker Dr.Chicago, IL 60606-7507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Private debt services in the nature of debt financing; equity services in the nature of private and commercial equity financing; financing services; investment services in the nature of private equity financing, investment management, and investment advisory services; financial investment services, all in the field of energy | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Utility services in the nature of transmitting and distributing electricity; utility services in the nature of distribution of natural gas and pipeline transportation services for natural gas | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Licensing of intellectual property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |