USPTO serial 76329866
TALKSHOW.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALKSHOW.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Conshohocken, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING TECHNICAL, CONTENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PRODUCING COMPUTERIZED INTERACTIVE INFORMATIONAL, ENTERTAINMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL SHOWS, BY OR OVER INTERNET, TV, CABLE, SATELLITE, VIDEO ON DEMAND, AND/OR WIRELESS, ENABLING THE GENERATION OF AUDIENCE RATINGS, ARCHIVING OF SHOWS,POLLING OF SHOW RESULTS, POSTING OF POLL RESULTS, OBTAINING AUDIENCE DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION, CREATING AUDIENCE PROFILES, DISPLAYING AUDIENCE NAMES, PROVIDING SHOW ALERTS, PROVIDING UPCOMING SHOW GUEST INFORMATION, MANAGING ORDER OF SHOW AUDIENCES AND/OR DISPLAYING AUTHOR INFORMATION; PRODUCING COMPUTERIZED INTERACTIVE INFORMATIONAL, ENTERTAINMENT OR EDUCATIONAL SHOWS, BY OR OVER INTERNET, TV CABLE, SATELLITE, VIDEO ON DEMAND, AND/OR WIRELESS, ENABLING THE GENERATION OF AUDIENCE RATINGS, ARCHIVING OF SHOWS, POLLING OF SHOW RESULTS, POSTING OF POLL RESULTS, OBTAINING AUDIENCE DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION, CREATING AUDIENCE PROFILES, DISPLAYING AUDIENCE NAMES, PROVIDING SHOW ALERTS, PROVIDING UPCOMING SHOW GUEST INFORMATION, MANAGING ORDER OF SHOW AUDIENCES AND/OR DISPLAYING AUTHOR INFORMATION; PROVIDING TECHNICAL, CONTENT AND/OR ORGANIZATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO BUSINESS ENTERPRISES TO ENABLE THE OPERATION OF INTERACTIVE INFORMATIONAL, ENTERTAINMENT OR EDUCATIONAL SHOWS, BY OR OVER INTERNET, TV CABLE,SATELLITE, VIDEO ON DEMAND, AND/OR WIRELESS, USING A COMPUTERIZED PLATFORM; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING TELEVISION TALK-SHOW PROGRAMMING VIA A COMPUTERIZED FACILITY BY OR OVER RADIO WAVES, DIGITAL NETWORKS, THE INTERNET, CABLE, SATELLITE, WIRELESS, VIDEO ON DEMAND AND/OR TV | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |