USPTO serial 76329975
WIMM-BILL-DANN IS WHAT YOU WANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3367418Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIMM-BILL-DANN IS WHAT YOU WANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Moscow, RU
Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Silverberg
Janet Silverberg PepsiCo, Inc.7701 Legacy DriveMail Stop 3A-421Plano, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food for babies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Kefir; charcuterie; butter, milk; meat; processed mushrooms; processed onions; processed olives; processed meat; namely, ham turkey, lamb, veal, beef; preserved vegetables; preserved fish for food purposes; processed garden herbs; processed fruit; fruits preserved in alcohol | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
- Other trademarks owned by Open Joint Stock Company Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named WIMM-BILL-DANN IS WHAT YOU WANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |