Drawing for QUICK-STUDY

USPTO serial 76329978

QUICK-STUDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK-STUDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES HIEKEN

CHARLES HIEKEN FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed educational materials for assisting students to learn elementary school subjects; namely, mathematics, reading, vocabulary, science and social studiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 23, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance